Rich: Yeah. Therefore, sandbox is become some type of a motto that is turned around sort of loosely, not just in the usa but across the world, and it will suggest various things to people that are different. Because itвЂ™s not sustainable over the long run if it means a kind of regulation free zone where anything goes and thereвЂ™s a lot of laxity, I donвЂ™t think thatвЂ™s good for consumers and I donвЂ™t think itвЂ™s good for the industry. I give some credence to that if you think that thatвЂ™s useful for incentivising fintech to try new things.
We attempted to try this sort of incentivising through our workplace, our system, which while you mentioned Dan Quan headed it. He had been tremendous during the Bureau, really invested lots of time understanding the fintech industry and bringing their insights back once again to the Bureau assisting us realize where these people were customer friendly and where they certainly were consumer risky and we also invested considerable time and paid lots of awareness of a number of the leading fintech businesses to simply help guide them to their method to see that they run into if we could help clarify some regulatory obscurity.
They inevitably encounter it because if theyвЂ™re providing new items, novel items then obviously, it is not apparent the way they squeeze into this regulatory scheme which will be drawn around current or prior/previous services and products.